‘It’s devastating’: the way thirty confined beluga whales have become tools in conflict over animal welfare.
The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming small “sweetheart”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “endless energy” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.
Thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a tussle between a shuttered park, local and national governments and advocacy groups.
But those most familiar with the whales say the intense debate over their future often ignores the complexities of the whales who, after living their entire lives in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the people who work with them regularly.
After the federal government blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to put them down unless the authorities pays for the expense of their survival. Canada’s fisheries minister has rejected that request, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.
Intelligent Marine Mammals
Scientists say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and group interactions indicate they are deeply intelligent mammals – something one caretaker learned directly.
She spent several years as a whale caretaker, a position that entailed building relationships of the aquatic animals.
“Building up those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”
Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so amazed by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their characters. She cultivated a deep bond for a pair of whales with different temperaments.
“One whale selected me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Each changed the way I view connection.”
Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions
Burgess’s interaction with the whales developed against a background of rising activist criticism to their captivity.
During her tenure at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s one orca, Kiska, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park ascribes to age-related causes, but which advocates say indicates the poor conditions in which they were kept.
The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes results of the closure. “Concrete is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and navigate with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”
The park did not reply to a inquiry, but in the past claimed: “The whales … receive far better medical attention and 24/7 care than any individual in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”
Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions
Burgess was dismissed from the facility in recent months following the death of a beluga, an ailing beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the park suspected information of the incident were shared to the news outlets and she was released not long after.
The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left her and current and former trainers in despair. She says the park’s warning to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” undertaking, adding any attempts to put down even a single beluga would require “considerable manpower”, trucks and machinery.
“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.
She advocates for requests for the whales to be removed right away from the park, with its failing enclosures and shrinking team.
In the autumn, Canada’s government official denied a bid to send the whales to an overseas location.
“Granting the request would have meant a perpetual life in enclosure and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official commented. “As the public, we know that belugas should be in the ocean, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience authorize an export that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have experienced.”
But Burgess said the minister’s remarks reveal a wider misunderstanding of the facts of living conditions for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.
“The society needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘end operations’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate
As officials struggle to find a answer, ideas have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the wilds of Canada’s north – where whales are a key source of food for local populations.
A suggested refuge in the region of Nova Scotia, which recently received regulatory clearance, has shown to be contentious. The planned location, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain hopeful that it could in time represent a long term answer for some of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ future.
Different voices say the idea of a protected habitat reflects a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a viable solution in the coming months.
An official, director of the sanctuary project, said the location will replicate the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales get from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|